Learning how to play the Iron Cross Craps System won't take a reader more than a few minutes. Remembering the strategy employed may take a session or two at a live casino craps table, but using advanced play isn't tough either, it's just a matter of putting the ideas into action! Tell your inside dealer you want the 5, 6 and 8 for $34 total beste casino paa nett driving school, then place the $10 bet in the field yourself. By doing this you have covered every number, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, except 7. You'll win on every roll now except the 7, which will cost you your entire $44 in bets. When a front-line winner rolls (the player shoots their point) your place bets will be marked "off" and you'll want to hold-off on your field bet until a new point is established. Then your place bets will be marked "on" again and you can go back to making your field wagers. If a 7-out rolls casino video games, you'll need to start all over with your place and field bets after a new number is established. When you have your $44 in action and a field number rolls, you'll be very happy, because you'll get a full payoff on the field and your place bets will stay up and require no more attention. Your $10 wager in the field will win $10 on 3, 4, 9, 10, 11. When 2 rolls you'll win $20 and when 12 rolls you'll win $30. Take your payoff and leave your original $10 bet where it was. Seven is the easiest number to make and can roll in six ways (1-6 video jennifer lopez, 6-1, 5-2, 2-5 norge casino forums, 4-2, 2-4). There are 30 ways another number can roll, so the odds that you will see a winning total on the next roll are 30 to 6, or 30 out of 36. However, you also get an extra payoff when the dice total 2 or 12, since most craps games pay double on the 2 and triple on the 12 for any field bets. The fact is, you will lose your bet 20 times out of 36, and get back 19 bets, so overall, you lose one bet out of 36, for a house edge of 2.78 percent (divide one by 36). For fun, you can always find a crap game that offers $1 bets and start with a smaller bankroll betting $1, then $2 online spilleautomater vs landbaserede spilleautomate, then $4 etc. after seeing three consecutive no-field rolls. For what it's worth, the odds of seeing 10 consecutive non-field rolls is (20/36) to the 10th, or about 357 to 1. Updated February 10, 2017 The field numbers add up to 16 wins in 36 rolls, or 20 loses in 36 rolls. Winning field rolls at Harrah's in Reno (odds per 36 rolls) are two (1 time), three (2 times), four (3 times), nine (4 times), ten (3 times), eleven (2 times) and twelve (1 time) - for a total of 16 winners (16/36). However, since when rolled, two pays double and twelve pays triple, the total payoff is 19. That looks like it has to be a winner, right? Wrong. He was in his eighties or nineties when I last saw him, still playing his beloved system of field bets at the crap game. Question Question Question Chapter 3 of 4 Chapter 4 of 4 As I write this (September 13, 2000) I've had 69 consecutive recorded sessions using the Bdalt Craps Playing System. I started keeping track of each session's winning or loss results on June 13th - exactly 3 months ago. Each of the first 31 sessions from June 13th to July 10th are detailed in chapter 4 of the Bdalt Craps Playing System. The next time I played craps was August 4th. Following are the results of the 38 craps playing sessions from August 4th through the last timed I played craps on September 12, 2000 (yesterday). The overall $179.03 win average over the 38 sessions, is a lot better than the $88.45 average win I experienced. Also all disney movies, had I quit during those losing sessions when I was earlier ahead by $300 or more, the overall total winning results would have been even greater. Although I know better, I let emotions get in the way. In the future, I'm really going to try to adhere to the Bdalt System's loss limit and win goal. Also, what hurt my overall winning average for the latest time period was that I had 29% losing sessions and only 16% losing sessions during the earlier period. Question I was shocked the last time I went to Bally's. Was there a box for the #2, #3, #11, and 12#. Posted: 01-Aug-04 21:16 I've seen many systems like this one, and I wouldn't want to play it. Usually you have to wait for something like 2 7s in a row and then place the inside numbers for one roll only. Then repeat after the next time you see 2 7s. If you happen to run into 3 7s in a row and lose, start over but increase your bets. 30 bucks for a million dollar idea. I'll go along with MrV on this one for now. I remember the 'Craps Pro' system by the learned Dr. Robert Anthony. Claimed to beat the Zumma tester as well. Only problem, it wasn't mechanical, which made the testing results differ each time it was tested. Which means it was a scam. Which makes the bad doctor a scammer. Which makes him a low life, lieing, piece of human debris. I'd pay hard-earned money to watch. I'm still waiting to hear more details about your testing procedure Wantawinner. I'll be in that recliner over there while you get all your info together and post. Oh well, maybe tomorrow. And once again we see Elvis ripping off another system author. One day one of these guys will catch up with him and that will be that. Posted: 31-Aug-04 00:02 Contrary to the spam poster's claim, several systems beat the book. Posted: 28-Aug-04 09:15 This logical fallacy is so commonly committed by gamblers that they ended up giving it its official name. While it might not seem like the kind of faulty logic that can lead those so misguided into disaster mobile casino network, the Gambler’s Fallacy has lost hopeful players their share of fortunes. As an example, imagine that instead of betting on a number, you’re now betting on a color – black. The last twenty spins of the roulette wheel have produced outcomes of red. Using the same logic as in the first scenario, you decide that black is sure to come up on the next spin, and you place a thousand dollars on it. You’re standing at a roulette table, watching the players make their bets. You observe two spins, and both times the ball lands on 23. You then decide to make a bet. Is it wise to bet on 23, considering it’s already come up twice in a row? Surely it’s extremely unlikely to come up three times in a row, so ignoring 23 might be a safe move, right? Most gambling systems and strategies are based on several basic errors in logic – errors that some of us commit every day, whether we’re gambling or not. If you’re planning a trip to Vegas, Tahoe or Atlantic City soon, be sure to keep these common fallacies in mind so you don’t fall prey to them. Many of us casino arizona indian bend, in fact, commit this fallacy every day. If you own an old clunker of a car that costs more to maintain than it cost to buy, you’re probably keeping it running out of a sense that you’ve “invested” too much money in the car to sell it off or trade it in. The Sunk Cost Fallacy is, at its core, a fallacy that plays on a basic human emotion – a feeling that all the money one has spent is not gone if it “contributes” to an eventual jackpot, or to a car that continues to run. Sadly, this kind of thinking almost always ends up costing us even more than we would have lost otherwise. 3) “This system I found guarantees that I’ll win at roulette/baccarat/[insert game of chance here]! I can’t lose!” (Betting systems) Опубликовано: 1 июл. 2016 г. I have tested thousands of roulette systems. I played roulette for over 30 years. I know what works and what doesn't. The VIP Roulette System gives you the best odds to win GUARANTEED! There is no other roulette strategy out there like this.
0 Comentarios
Deja una respuesta. |
ArchivosNo hay ningún archivo Categorías |